Journal Information
Download PDF
More article options
Review article
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2021.03.004
Open Access
Available online 8 May 2021
Convalescent plasma therapy - a silver lining for COVID-19 management?
Sumit Saha, Sachin Kadam
Corresponding author

Corresponding author at: Advancells Group, Noida, U.P. 201301. India.
Advancells Group, Noida, India
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (1)
Tables (3)
Table 1. COVID-19 drugs used for therapeutic purpose.
Table 2. Plasma therapy reports of SARS and MERS.
Table 3. Plasma therapy reports on COVID-19.
Show moreShow less

The COVID-19 pandemic has pushed the world towards social, economic, and medical challenges. Scientific research in medicine is the only means to overcome novel and complex diseases like COVID-19. To sum up the therapeutic wild-goose chase, many available antivirals and repurposed drugs have failed to show successful clinical evidence in patient recovery, several vaccine candidates are still waiting in the trial pipelines and a few have become available to the common public for administration in record time.

However, with upcoming evidence of coronavirus mutations, available vaccines may thrive on the spirit of doubt about efficacy and effectiveness towards these new strains of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV2). In all these collective uncertainties, plasma therapy has shown a ray of hope for critically ill patients.

To date, with very few published case studies of convalescent plasma in COVID-19, there are two school of thought process in the scientific community regarding plasma therapy efficiency and this leads to confusion due to the lack of optimal randomized and controlled studies.

Without undertaking any robust scientific studies, evidence or caution, accepting any therapy unanimously may cause more harm than good, but with a clearer understanding of SARS-CoV2 immunopathology and drug response, plasma therapy might be the silver lining against COVID-19 for the global community.

Convalescent plasma therapy
COVID-19 Treatment
Full Text

Globally, as January 4, 2021, there have been 83,910,386 confirmed COVID-19 cases, including 1839,660 deaths, as per World Health Organization (WHO) reports1. Although the race to find any substantial COVID-19 treatment and effective vaccine has gained a necessary acceleration, with a steep increase in the infection rate worldwide, the majority of the countries are currently on the doorstep of a second wave of COVID-19. Even after one year from the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) detection in China2, therapeutic strategies for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with antivirals and repurposed drugs are facing critical challenges for approval due to the lack of clinical evidence or inadequate successful in vivo patient reports. Meanwhile, the sprint to produce safe and effective vaccines has gained tremendous momentum with a few candidates already in the market3, but their success is still uncertain . Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and American Association of Blood Banks have asked vaccine recipients to hold off plasma donation, owing to antibody selectivity towards specific regions of SARS-CoV24. This further raises questions on vaccine efficiency in the case of strain mutations of COVID-19-causing coronavirus5,6.

Since COVID-19 therapeutic research began, with available knowledge of the last two decades against two different strains of beta-coronaviruses (βCoVs): Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)7,8, researchers rushed to repurpose existing drugs in an attempt to alter the course of severe COVID-19, but the results were far less than clinically significant. A list of drugs9 used against COVID-19 for therapeutic purpose have been reported in Table 1. The Solidarity Trial evaluation report published by the WHO on October 15, 2020, reveals interim results of experimental antiviral Remdesivir, the malaria medication Hydroxychloroquine, a combination of HIV drugs Lopinavir/Ritonavir and an immune system messenger Interferon treatments had little or no effect on overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay in hospitalized patients, as these drugs showed health risks and failed to reduce COVID-19 mortality in patient cohorts10. Amidst the wait for effective treatment, passive immunization strategy of convalescent plasma therapy emerged as a hopeful tactic for the prevention and management of COVID-19, but some convalescent plasma studies, such as the multi-centric study funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)11, have found no significant clinical improvement or reduction in mortality in severe COVID-19 cases. This adds to more confusion about the use of plasma therapy in COVID-19. The present review aims to provide an overview of the recent plasma therapy research in the COVID-19 domain, while evaluating critical limitations to enhance clinical efficacy.

Table 1.

COVID-19 drugs used for therapeutic purpose.

Drug  Mode of action  Caveats  References 
Remdesivir  Repurposed antiviral drug.  Based on WHO “Solidarity” trial, Remdesivir appeared to have little or no effect on COVID-19 mortality.  10 
Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine  Repurposed antimalarial drug with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties.  Several studies reported that these drugs were not effective in the treatment or prevention of COVID-19.  10,12 
LY-CoV555  Virus-targeting monoclonal antibody therapy.  A drug study on hospitalized patients was paused due to safety concerns at the manufacturing plant.  13,14 
REGNCOV2  Antibody cocktail of REGN10933 and REGN10987 targeting "spike" protein.  A drug study has been limited to enroll only patients with mild COVID-19 ailment by barring cases of severe illness.  15,16 
Tocilizumab  Repurposed rheumatoid arthritis monoclonal antibody (against IL-6 receptor) therapy with anti-inflammatory properties.  The efficacy of the of the drug to treat severe COVID-19-related pneumonia has failed in a late-stage trial.  17 
Lopinavir/Ritonavir  Repurposed HIV antiretroviral drug combination.  WHO solidarity trial reports suggest no reduction in the mortality of COVID-19 patients when compared to the standard of care.  10 
Sarilumab  Repurposed rheumatoid arthritis monoclonal antibody therapy (against IL-6 receptor) with anti-inflammatory properties.  Sanofi has reported the drug's failure as a COVID-19 treatment after the latest set of trials.  18,19 
Ruxolitinib  Repurposed JAK inhibitors with anti-inflammatory properties.  The drug has shown positive effects in many COVID-19 cases, but still requires effective controlled trials to establish itself.  20 
Camostat mesylate  Repurposed protease inhibitor used in pancreatitis.  Some studies have seen positive effects, but several trials are yet to be performed before fixating on its potential.  21,22 
IFX-1  Monoclonal antibody (anti-C5a) therapy with anti-inflammatory properties.  A randomized, multicenter phase II/III study is recruiting and no conclusive therapeutic evidence is preset yet.  23 
RhACE APN01  Recombinant human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (rhACE2) to prevent virus entry and replication.  A phase 2 clinical trial is recruiting and no conclusive therapeutic evidence is present yet.  24 
Historical evidence

Convalescent plasma therapy can be traced back to the 20th century, when the plasma of animals, stimulated with infectious agents, were used for immediate short-term antibody-based immunization for the prevention and treatment of diseases25. Kitaso and Von Behring26 achieved a significant milestone in the 1890s for treating diphtheria using blood serum from immunized animal donors, which were later replaced by plasma from recovered donors with specific antibody-based humoral immunity of human origin. Although antibiotics have superseded the requirement for plasma therapy in the case of bacterial infections27, it is considered as an important strategy against viral pathogens when prophylaxis or treatments are not available. Besides diphtheria, plasma therapy has also been used in the prophylaxis and treatment of several bacterial diseases, such as pertussis and scarlet fever28. For the first time, during the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, plasma therapy was reported to be majorly effective in the case of viral diseases on a mass scale29,30 and soon, extensive research on convalescent plasma therapy indicated significant efficacy in the case of chickenpox, measles, cytomegalovirus infection, H1N1 and H5N1 flu, parovirus B19 infection, Ebola, SARS and MERS31–37.

In convalescent plasma therapy, blood is isolated from a recovered patient who has developed humoral immunity against a particular disease-causing pathogen (e.g., SARS-CoV-2, in the case of COVID-19) and plasma containing specific neutralizing antibodies38 is obtained by apheresis for transfusion in diseased patients after matching the ABO compatibility (Figure 1). Besides neutralizing antibodies against the specific pathogen, the plasma obtained by apheresis also contains anti-inflammatory cytokines, clotting factors and other natural antibodies to support the immunomodulatory benefits of convalescent plasma therapy39.

Figure 1.

Plasma Therapy Procedure for COVID-19 Treatment: The blood of a recovered COVID-19 patient is collected and convalescent plasma is recovered by apheresis. The colleted plasma undergoes an ABO/RHD compatibility check and a viral load inactivation before being processed for transfusion into a COVID-19 patient with severe/mild disease conditions. Adapted from Casadevall et al.40. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19

As the current pandemic scenario strictly deals with coronavirus, it is particularly eminent to discuss the therapeutic evidence of convalescent plasma therapy in the context of coronavirus-caused SARS and MERS diseases (Table 2).

Table 2.

Plasma therapy reports of SARS and MERS.

Disease  Publication  No. of Patients administered with Plasma  Non-Plasma Medication  Time of Plasma Administration  Volume of Plasma Infused  Plasma Antibody Titer a  Patient Outcome 
SARS  Soo et al., 41  19  Ribavirin and Methylprednisolone  11.42 days (Mean) after onset.  200 −400ml  1:160 to 1:2560  74% of the ‘plasma group’ patients were discharged by day 22. 
SARS  Cheng et al., 42  80  Cefotaxime and Levofloxacin (on day of admission), Ribavirin, and Methylprednisolone  14 days (Mean) after onset.  279.3 ± 127.1 ml (Mean)  1:160 to 1:2560  Mortality rate was 6.3% and 21.9% for patient groups receiving infusion before and after 14 days of onset, respectively. 
SARS  Yeh et al., 43  Ribavirin, Methylprednisolone, IVIG, and Lopinavir/Ritonavir  10 days and 11 days after onset.  500ml  1:160 to > 640  All patients survived with a drop in viral load and subsequent enhancement in IgM and IgG levels. 
MERS  Chun et al., 44  Ribavirin, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, and Interferon α−2a  9 days after onset.  250ml  Not defined  Possible non-antibody mediated TRALI (transfusion-related acute lung injury) was observed within 2 h after transfusion. 
MERS  Ko et al., 45  Not defined  Patient1- 11 days after onset; Patient2- 8 days after onset;Patient3- 14 days after onset.  Not defined  Not defined  Patient 1 - Given second plasma infusion and discharged after 33 days of onset; Patient 2 - Possible TRALI observed and discharged after 102 days of onset; Patient 3 - Possible oxygenation issue was observed and discharged after 39 days. 

Antibody titers are detected by different methods and might not be fully comparable.

In the case of COVID-19, plasma therapy can act as an anti-viral, as well as an anti-inflammatory, agent against SARS-CoV2 infection, which may adversely affect pulmonary capacity and cause acute respiratory distress syndrome-like symptoms due to cytokine storms in severe stages46,47.

In a study at Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong42, 80 SARS-CoV-infected patients were administered with convalescent plasma when their condition was not improving, even after receiving their methylprednisolone dose. The patient outcomes showed positive improvement in the health conditions, but it was observed that patients who received plasma therapy within 14 days from the infection showed better outcomes, compared to the patients who received plasma after 14 days. In the same hospital, another study41 was conducted to compare the effects of plasma therapy against methylprednisolone. Out of 40 SARS patients undergoing ribavirin and methylprednisolone treatment, 19 were administered with convalescent plasma, whereas 21 were given an additional dose of methylprednisolone. The group of patients who were treated with plasma therapy showed better recovery and reduced mortality. In a different study in Taiwan43, 3 critical SARS patients were administered with convalescent plasma and showed stark improvements within 24 h of the administration. Although the reported cases emphasized the success of plasma therapy in the SARS-CoV infection, the major limitation was the randomization and sample size issues. The inadequate, yet significant, success reports of convalescent plasma therapy further prompted researchers to use it as a therapeutic tool against the MERS-CoV infection. In a 2016 report44, a MERS-CoV infected patient showed viral load reduction upon treatment with convalescent plasma therapy after administration of ribavirin and lopinavir/ritonavir with interferon α−2a dosage. In another small study45, 3 MERS patients were administered with convalescent plasma of different titers to determine the earliest seroconversion. Although all the patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital, the study reported that a higher neutralizing antibody titer (≥ 1:80) might be responsible for early seroconversion, thereby having a major impact on the immunity.

Several observational studies in COVID-19 patients using plasma therapy have shown positive results with some incidence of adverse effects (Table 3). The first press-published report of treating COVID-19 patients with convalescent plasma therapy came out in China, where 245 patients were treated with specific neutralizing antibodies and the therapy was assured to be safe and effective48. Following this, a pilot study from China reported significant viral load reduction and improvements in the clinical symptoms for 10 severe COVID-19 patients, who were infused with convalescent plasma as an addition to antivirals and supportive care49. In another small study, 5 COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation were infused with a neutralizing plasma titer > 1:1000 and showed significant reduction in fever, viral load and ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome)50. Another patient study in China51 also portrayed similar benefits of convalescent plasma therapy and hailed it as a potential solution to the pandemic crisis. Amidst these single-arm studies, one particular study by Wu et al.,52 reported that anti-SARS-CoV2 spike-binding antibodies in patients were detected from days 10 to15 after the disease onset and hinted at the need to explore the interplay between viral load and immune response. The study also reported that elderly and middle-aged COVID-19 patients had significantly higher anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody titers than young patients. In another study, Zhang et al. reported plasma therapy benefits in COVID-19 patients with a history of severe underlying health conditions, such as hypertension, renal failure, ARDS and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). They further suggested that patients who survive severe illness might have higher anti-SARS-CoV2 antibody titers with longer persistence, compared to patients with non-severe disease53. Along the same lines, a study by Zhao et al., concluded that a higher antibody titer in patients is independently associated with the severity of the disease and worse clinical stages54.

Table 3.

Plasma therapy reports on COVID-19.

Disease  Publication  No. of patients administered with Plasma  Non-plasma medication  Time of plasma administration  Volume of plasma infused  Plasma antibody titer a  Patient outcome 
COVID-19Shen et al., 50  Antivirals and Methylprednisolone  10 - 22 days after hospitalization  400 ml in 2 doses  1:1000  All 5 patients showed a decrease in viral load and inflammatory marker levels by day 12 after transfusion. 
Ye et al., 51  Arbidol and Levofloxacin  10 - 16 days after onset  Variable doses of 200ml  Not Defined  All 6 patients had different underlying health conditions with respiratory distress before plasma therapy. Variable transfusion doses in all patients led to higher antibody titers and reduction in lung opacification. 
Duan et al., 49  10  Methylprednisolone, Arbidol, Ribavirin, Combination therapy with Arbidol and Ribavirin/Remdesivir/Peramivir  16.5 days (median) after onset  200ml  1:640  All 10 patients showed a reduction in symptoms of fever, cough, shortness of breath, and chest pain within 3 days after transfusion. Neutralizing antibody titers were significantly high by day 6 post-transfusion and patients showed significant reduction in lung lesions. 
Zhang et al., 53  Patient 1 - Arbidol, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, interferon alpha, human immunoglobulin, zadaxin, antibacterial and antifungal drugs;Patient 2 - Arbidol, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, interferon-2alpha, Methylprednisolone;Patient 3 - Arbidol, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Oseltamivir, Ribavirin, interferon-2alpha, Caspofungin, Voriconazole, and;Patient 4 - Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Ribavirin, Vancomycin and Imipenem  Patient 1 – 17 - 28 days after hospitalization;Patient 2 - 11 days after hospitalization;Patient 3 – 14 - 39 days after hospitalization, and;Patient 4 - 19 days after hospitalization  Patient 1 - 900 ml in 3 doses;Patient 2 - 200 ml;Patient 3 – 2400 ml in 8 doses, and;Patient 4 - 300ml  Not Defined  All patients showed a decrease in viral load and absorption in lung consolidation/opacities/infiltrative lesions. After COVID-19 recovery, Patient 2 was suggested oxygen therapy and Patient 3 was given separate medical care for underlying diseases. 
Joyner et al., 56,57  20,000  Not Defined  Not Defined  200 - 500ml  Not Defined  The overall 7-day mortality rate was 12.96% with < 1% of all plasma transfusion cases experiencing serious adverse events, including TACO, TRALI, and transfusion-related reactions. 
Perotti et al., 59  46  Antibiotics, Hydroxychloroquine, Anticoagulants  Not Defined  Variable doses of 250 - 300ml  1:80 to 1:640  Out of 46 patients, 3 were deceased within 7-day period from transfusion (patients had serious comorbidities and low PaO/FiO2 ratio). In the case of the other patients, a significant reduction in lung infiltrate and viral load was observed. 
Salazar et al., 63  25  Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, Ribavirin, Lopinavir-Ritonavir  10 days (median) after onset  300ml  ≤ 1:1350  Out of 25 patients, one patient was deceased, while the secondary endpoint improvement in patient outcome was based on the improvement in the modified six-point WHO ordinal scale on day 14 after transfusion. 
  Agarwal et al., 11  235  Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Oseltamivir, broad spectrum antibiotics and immunomodulators  Not Defined  2 doses of 200ml  160 patients received detectable titers (≥ 1:80 titer was received by 67) and 64 patients received undetectable titers  Over a period of 7 days post-transfusion, average levels of inflammatory markers showed no statistically significant difference between the two arms. The plasma intervention group showed a 15% mortality rate, compared to 14% mortality rate in the control group. Moreover, the WHO ordinal scale scores for clinical improvement did not differ between the two arms. 
  Simonovich et al., 61  228  Antiviral agents and Glucocorticoids  8 days (median) after onset  500 ml (median)  1:800 to 1:3200  The 30-day mortality rate was 10.96% for plasma group, compared to 11.43% for the placebo group. Aside from that, infusion-related adverse events were more common in the plasma group (4.8%) than in the placebo group (1.9%).Overall, COVID-19 patients did not receive any significant clinical benefit upon plasma transfusion. 

Antibody titers are detected by different methods and might not be fully comparable.

Convalescent plasma therapy gained an FDA expanded access status for the treatment of COVID-19 in April55 . As a part of the expanded access program, Joyner et al.,56 suggested beneficial effects of plasma transfusion in COVID-19 treatment along with incidence of related TRALI and transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) complications in some patients. Extending the same open-label trial, plasma transfusion was performed with 20,000 patients and regarded safe with a very low incidence of adverse effects57. Going a step ahead of using convalescent plasma, Perotti et al. utilized hyperimmune plasma (a concentrate obtained from a pool of convalescent plasma donors58) to treat a group of 46 patients and showed significant reduction in the viral load and ARDS conditions for 42 of them59.

In May 2020, the ICMR approved 38 centers for an open-label randomized parallel-arm Phase II plasma transfusion study (PLACID trial) in COVID-19 patients60. The study with 464 adults failed to show any significant association of convalescent plasma transfusion to reduction in disease progression and mortality, thus setting a major question on the utility of plasma therapy in COVID-19 treatment. Another recent study by Simonovich et al. also concluded on similar terms, as no significant difference was observed in COVID-19 clinical outcomes between the plasma therapy group and placebo group61. Currently, the largest study (PLATINA trial) to date is ongoing to analyze the effectiveness of plasma therapy in approximately 500 COVID-19 patients and, although the ICMR study results have constituted a setback to the use of plasma transfusion, positive results of this Maharashtra (India) government-approved study might be the last hope for establishing plasma therapy as a standard therapeutic intervention in COVID-19 cases62.


Amidst the critical search for medications and vaccines against COVID-19, the age-old technique of passive immunization using convalescent plasma emerged as a savior for several patients infected with SARS-CoV2. Many observational single-arm studies worldwide showed significant improvements in the clinical outcomes and mortality of severely ill COVID-19 patients by reducing viral load and lung injury49–51, but some patient cohort studies11,61 reported no significant effect of plasma transfusion in determining patient conditions. Furthermore, a meta-analysis study by Chan et al. in 2020 reported uncertainty in determining the role of plasma therapy in reducing COVID-19 mortality, but suggested that it may increase the improvement of clinical symptoms by up to 15 days64. These patient reports using plasma therapy have their own specific caveats to amend, which might result in more efficient ways of studying plasma transfusion in COVID-19 cases.

Most of the studies to date showed benefits of plasma transfusion in COVID-19 patient outcomes, but, as discussed in the review, they had the limitation of not being randomized and controlled. This factor was taken into consideration in the recently published PLACID trial report11. Although the PLACID trial questioned the effectiveness of plasma transfusion in COVID-19 patients, aside from the already mentioned limitations in the paper, it had a major drawback: 94% of the donors had mild disease, while two-thirds of them had a median titer value of 1:40. The US FDA recommends the use of donor convalescent plasma with the 1:160 neutralizing titer65 and studies have shown that early intervention with higher neutralizing antibody titers66,67 show better clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, including these considerations in the PLACID trial might have shown significant results in patient outcomes. Moreover, the PLACID trial does not mention the use of hyperimmune plasma therapy58, though the donor titers were considerably lower than the recommended levels. Utilizing the technology of hyperimmune plasma therapy in the PLACID trial also might have led to a positive perspective, as higher neutralizing antibody titers in transfused plasma would have shown better therapeutic efficiency.

The above-discussed drawbacks of non-standardized neutralizing antibody titers and plasma transfusion conditions are crucial concerns that impede the potential practice of plasma therapy against COVID-19. Aside from these limitations, our review also sheds light on three important points of concern in the case of utilizing plasma therapy for patients with severe COVID-19:

  • 1.

    In the case of severe COVID-19, an inflammatory cytokine storm has been observed in several studies68, in addition to higher antibody titers69. Reports have shown that Anti-SARS-CoV-IgG levels generally peak in the fourth week70 and this robust response not only contributes to the clearance of viral load, but also might lead to antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection and immune-mediated tissue damage54,69. Furthermore, a severe disease-mediated cytokine storm exhibits elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine levels which may lead to respiratory failure, tissue damage, and lymphopenia71. Lymphopenia causes a low count of T cells in the body and this significant decrease further halts the immune action against the SARS-CoV2 viral antigen bound by antibodies. Previous studies have shown that the reduction of the inflammatory cytokine storm can oppose lymphopenia72 and therefore, resorting to immunomodulatory tactics before plasma transfusion in severe COVID-19 patients can enhance the efficiency of convalescent plasma therapy and reduce mortality. One of the frequently studied approaches is the dampening of inflammatory responses, specifically IL-6 (stable indicator for poor outcomes in ARDS and pneumonia73), by using the monoclonal antibody (mAb) Tocilizumab74. Other neutralizing mAbs against different potential inflammatory targets, such as IL-1β and TNF-α75, or small molecule blockers of immunopathology-based downstream signaling might also be used for controlled immunosuppression. The second approach involves mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for their anti-inflammatory and anti-viral effects76. Such immunomodulatory approaches will further reduce the risks of TRALI in COVID-19 patients undergoing plasma transfusion 77.

  • 2.

    Although studies on COVID-19 have not yet shed significant light on antiviral drug resistance, there is a high risk of conventional antivirals being ineffective against SARS-CoV2, owing to previous records of antiviral resistance in single-stranded RNA viruses, such as hepatitis and influenza viruses78. Mutations, or genetic changes, arise naturally in all viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, as they replicate and circulate in human populations. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, these mutations are accumulating at a rate of around one to two mutations per month globally79. As a result of this, thousands of mutations might already have arisen in the SARS-CoV-2 genome since the virus emerged in 2019. Protein structure mutations have been observed to play a major role in drug resistance and, although studies on SARS-CoV2 drug resistance are yet to decipher specific resistance mechanisms, December 2020 witnessed a rapidly spreading mutated strain of Corona virus contributing to increased transmission5,6. The new UK coronavirus variant VUI 202,012/01 and the South Africa coronavirus variant 501.V2, with genetic mutations in the “spike” protein and other alterations, could lead to loss of antibody affinity against SARS-CoV2. These new strains have already raised huge concerns on available vaccine efficiency and scientists are claiming that indiscriminate and random plasma transfusion might fuel more such mutations80. These mutation concerns might also be due to the rampant use of antivirals without proper clinical data. Therefore, besides the immediate requirement for optimized controlled plasma therapy studies, research for detecting more drug targets should be heavily ongoing, besides opting for safer anti-viral options, such as mesenchymal stromal cells81.

  • 3.

    A critical point of concern in COVID-19 plasma therapy is based on the limitations of convalescent plasma collection procedure and processing. The safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy for COVID-19 treatment is fairly dependent on technical, ethical and legal safeguards of transfusion (informed doctor-patient consent, compliance with regulatory requirements, effective pre-screening and pre-donation testing of candidates, etc.)82. To assure good quality of blood transfusion or plasma collection procedure, approval for blood banks and hospitals by regulatory authorities, mobilizing more technolegally-approved transfusion and apheresis machines, hiring trained medical professionals, etc., require mandatory attention, in addition to legal medical licensing83. Aside from the procedure, the quality of the convalescent plasma is also a major criterion for ensuring plasma therapy efficiency. It is better to avoid whole blood transfusion, unless clinically indicated, as plasma collection by apheresis can optimize the generated plasma volume by reducing the loss of red blood cells. Moreover, viral inactivation and transfusion-transmitted infections testing (using nucleic acid testing (NAT) and enzyme-linked fluorescence assay (ELFA)) should be made compulsory in the donor screening process. These processing procedures significantly add to safe plasma collection, though donors can be excluded for unfavorable vein size or inadequate hemoglobin, even after passing the health screening for donation84. Another crucial limiting factor in the collection and processing of plasma for COVID-19 treatment is the detection of neutralizing antibodies, as low neutralizing antibody titers may defeat the purpose of efficient plasma therapy even with optimum plasma volume and net donor antibody titers. Therefore, regulating and optimizing the quality of convalescent plasma collection and processing might accelerate plasma therapy towards being a more potential COVID-19 treatment.

As of now, with a vacuum of efficient anti-SARS-CoV2 medications, there is an alarming need for more randomized and controlled plasma therapy-based clinical studies on COVID-19 patient outcomes, with strong emphasis on the above-mentioned points of concern and drawbacks. While it is good to be hopeful, the question of convalescent plasma therapy being a silver lining in COVID-19 management is still a long way from being answered with a definite response, but with more research and better understanding of SARS-CoV2 immunopathology and drug response, plasma therapy might gain an unequivocal ‘thumbs-up’ from the global clinical community.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. World Health Organization. Available from: [Cited 4 January 2021]
N. Zhu, D. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Li, B. Yang, J. Song, et al.
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.
N Engl J Med, 382 (2020), pp. 727-733
Covid-19 vaccine: timeline on nine countries which started rolling out vaccines. DNA India. Available from: [Cited 20 December 2020]
Bock H. After getting vaccine, FDA says wait to donate convalescent plasma. KFOX. Available from: [Cited 21 December 2020]
Covid-19: new coronavirus variant is identified in UK. The BMJ. Available from: [Cited 20 December 2020]
South Africa coronavirus variant: what is the risk?BBC News. Available from: [Cited 5 January 2021]
R.-.H. Xu, J.-.F. He, M.R. Evans, G.-.W. Peng, H.E. Field, D-W Yu, et al.
Epidemiologic Clues to SARS Origin in China.
Emerg Infect Dis, 10 (2004), pp. 1030-1037
A.M. Zaki, S. van Boheemen, T.M. Bestebroer, A.D.M.E. Osterhaus, R.A.M. Fouchier.
Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.
N Engl J Med, 367 (2012), pp. 1814-1820
Lifeline pipeline. Reuters. Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
“Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments. World Health Organization. Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
A. Agarwal, A. Mukherjee, G. Kumar, P. Chatterjee, T. Bhatnagar, P. Malhotra, et al.
Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate covid-19 in adults in India: open label phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial).
FDA cautions against use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19 outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial due to risk of heart rhythm problems. FDA. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
P. Chen, A. Nirula, B. Heller, R.L. Gottlieb, J. Boscia, J. Morris, et al.
SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with Covid-19.
N Engl J Med, 384 (2021), pp. 229-237
Eli Lilly faces FDA crackdown for manufacturing issues at plant handling COVID-19 antibody. FiercePharma. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
Regeneron's REGN-COV2 Antibody Cocktail Reduced Viral Levels and Improved Symptoms in Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
Banerjee A. Regeneron to stop enrolling very sick COVID-19 patients in antibody trial. Reuters. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
Roche's Actemra fails to meet Phase III goals in Covid-19 patients. Clinical Trials Arena.Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
Sanofi says Kevzara drug fails as possible COVID-19 treatment. Reuters. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
S. Rusconi.
Pilot Study on the Use of Sarilumab in Patients with COVID-19 Infection.
A.M. Vannucchi, B. Sordi, A. Morettini, C. Nozzoli, L. Poggesi, F. Pieralli, et al.
Compassionate use of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib for severe COVID-19: a prospective observational study.
Hoffmann M., Hofmann-Winkler H., Smith J.C., Kruger N., Sorensen L.K., Sogaard O.S., et al. Camostat mesylate inhibits SARS-CoV-2 activation by TMPRSS2-related proteases and its metabolite GBPA exerts antiviral activity. bioRxiv 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.08.05.237651
H. Hofmann-Winkler, O. Moerer, S. Alt-Epping, A. Brauer, B. Buttner, M. Muller, et al.
Camostat mesylate may reduce severity of coronavirus disease 2019 sepsis: a first observation.
Crit Care Explor, 2 (2020), pp. e0284
InflaRx GmbH. A Pragmatic Adaptive Randomized, Controlled Phase II/III Multicenter Study of IFX-1 in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.; 2020. Available from: [Cited 3 February 2021]
Apeiron Biologics.
Recombinant Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (RhACE2) as a Treatment for Patients with COVID-19.
Graham B.S., Ambrosino D.M. History of Passive Antibody Administration for Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(3):129–134. doi:10.1097/COH.0000000000000154
S.H.E. Kaufmann.
Remembering Emil von Behring: from Tetanus Treatment to Antibody Cooperation with Phagocytes.
H.-.K. Wong, C.-.K. Lee.
Pivotal role of convalescent plasma in managing emerging infectious diseases.
Vox Sang, 115 (2020), pp. 545-547
T.C. Luke, A. Casadevall, S.J. Watowich, S.L. Hoffman, J.H. Beigel, T.H. Burgess.
Hark back: passive immunotherapy for influenza and other serious infections.
Crit Care Med, 38 (2010), pp. e66-e73
W.R. Redden.
Treatment of Influenza-Pneumonia by Use of Convalescent Human Serum.
Boston Med Surg J, 181 (1919), pp. 688-691
J.J. O'Malley, F.W. Hartman.
Treatment of Influenzal Pneumonia with Plasma of Convalescent Patients.
J Am Med Assoc, 72 (1919), pp. 34-37
B. Nour, M. Green, M. Michaels, J. Reyes, A. Tzakis, J.C. Gartner, et al.
Parvovirus B19 infection in pediatric transplant patients.
Transplantation, 56 (1993), pp. 835-838
A. Zingher, P. Mortimer.
Convalescent whole blood, plasma and serum in the prophylaxis of measles: JAMA, 12 April, 1926; 1180-1187.
Rev Med Virol, 15 (2005), pp. 407-418
B. Zhou, N. Zhong, Y. Guan.
Treatment with convalescent plasma for influenza A (H5N1) infection.
N Engl J Med, 357 (2007), pp. 1450-1451
D.F. Florescu, A.C. Kalil, A.L. Hewlett, A.J. Schuh, U. Stroher, T.M. Uyeki, et al.
Administration of Brincidofovir and Convalescent Plasma in a Patient With Ebola Virus Disease.
Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am, 61 (2015), pp. 969-973
Who Mers-Cov Research Group.
State of Knowledge and Data Gaps of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Humans.
V.W.S. Wong, D. Dai, A.K.L. Wu, J.J.Y. Sung.
Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome with convalescent plasma.
Hong Kong Med J Xianggang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 9 (2003), pp. 199-201
I.F. Hung, K.K. To, C.-.K. Lee, K.-.L. Lee, K. Chan, W.-.W. Yan, et al.
Convalescent plasma treatment reduced mortality in patients with severe pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection.
Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am, 52 (2011), pp. 447-456
T. Burnouf, J. Seghatchian.
Ebola virus convalescent blood products: where we are now and where we may need to go.
Transfus Apher Sci Off J World Apher Assoc Off J Eur Soc Haemapheresis, 51 (2014), pp. 120-125
O. Garraud, F. Heshmati, B. Pozzetto, F. Lefrere, R. Girot, A. Saillol, et al.
Plasma therapy against infectious pathogens, as of yesterday, today and tomorrow.
Transfus Clin Biol J Soc Francaise Transfus Sang, 23 (2016), pp. 39-44
A. Casadevall, L. Pirofski.
The convalescent sera option for containing COVID-19.
J Clin Invest, 130 (2020), pp. 1545-1548
Y.O.Y. Soo, Y. Cheng, R. Wong, D.S. Hui, C.K. Lee, K.K.S. Tsang, et al.
Retrospective comparison of convalescent plasma with continuing high-dose methylprednisolone treatment in SARS patients.
Clin Microbiol Infect, 10 (2004), pp. 676-678
Y. Cheng, R. Wong, Y.O.Y. Soo, W.S. Wong, C.K. Lee, M.H.L. Ng, et al.
Use of convalescent plasma therapy in SARS patients in Hong Kong.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 24 (2005), pp. 44-46
K.-.M. Yeh, T.-.S. Chiueh, L.K. Siu, J.-.C. Lin, P.K.S. Chan, M.-.Y. Peng, et al.
Experience of using convalescent plasma for severe acute respiratory syndrome among healthcare workers in a Taiwan hospital.
J Antimicrob Chemother, 56 (2005), pp. 919-922
S. Chun, C.R. Chung, Y.E. Ha, T.H. Han, C.S. Ki, E.S. Kang, et al.
Possible Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury Following Convalescent Plasma Transfusion in a Patient With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.
Ann Lab Med, 36 (2016), pp. 393-395
J.-.H. Ko, H. Seok, S.Y. Cho, Y.E. Ha, J.Y. Baek, S.H. Kim, et al.
Challenges of convalescent plasma infusion therapy in Middle East respiratory coronavirus infection: a single centre experience.
Antivir Ther, 23 (2018), pp. 617-622
D. McGonagle, K. Sharif, A. O'Regan, C. Bridgewood.
The Role of Cytokines including Interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced Pneumonia and Macrophage Activation Syndrome-Like Disease.
J.Y. Ahn, Y. Sohn, S.H. Lee, Y. Cho, J.H. Hyun, Y.J. Baek, et al.
Use of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Two COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Korea.
J Korean Med Sci, 35 (2020), pp. e149
China puts 245 COVID-19 patients on convalescent plasma therapy. Xinhua | Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
K. Duan, B. Liu, C. Li, H. Zhang, T. Yu, J. Qu, et al.
Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients.
Proc Natl Acad Sci, 117 (2020), pp. 9490-9496
C. Shen, Z. Wang, F. Zhao, Y. Yang, J. Li, J. Yuan, et al.
Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma.
JAMA, 323 (2020), pp. 1582-1589
M. Ye, D. Fu, Y. Ren, F. Wang, D. Wang, F. Zhang, et al.
Treatment with convalescent plasma for COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China.
J Med Virol, (April 15, 2020),
Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. medRxiv. Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
B. Zhang, S. Liu, T. Tan, W. Huang, Y. Dong, L. Chen, et al.
Treatment with convalescent plasma for critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.
Chest, 158 (2020), pp. e9-e13
J. Zhao, Q. Yuan, H. Wang, W. Liu, X. Liao, Y. Su, et al.
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019.
Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am, 71 (2020), pp. 2027-2034
M.D MJJ. Expanded Access to Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19.; 2020. Available from: [Cited 16 December 2020]
Joyner M.J., Wright R.S., Fairweather D., Senefeld J.W., Bruno K.A., Klassen S.A., et al. Early safety indicators of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in 5000 patients. J Clin Invest. 130(9):4791–4797. doi:10.1172/JCI140200
M.J. Joyner, K.A. Bruno, S.A. Klassen, K.L. Kunze, P.W. Johnson, E.R. Lesser, et al.
Safety Update.
Mayo Clin Proc, 95 (2020), pp. 1888-1897
P. Annamaria, Q. Eugenia, S Paolo.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune plasma workflow.
C. Perotti, F. Baldanti, R. Bruno, C. Del Fante, E. Seminari, S. Casari, et al.
Mortality reduction in 46 severe Covid-19 patients treated with hyperimmune plasma. A proof of concept single arm multicenter trial.
Haematologica, 105 (2020), pp. 2834-2840
ICMR approves 38 institutions for COVID-19 PLACID trial. Express Healthcare. Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
V.A. Simonovich, L.D. Burgos Pratx, P. Scibona, M.V. Beruto, M.G. Vallone, C. Vazquez, et al.
A Randomized Trial of Convalescent Plasma in Covid-19 Severe Pneumonia.
N Engl J Med, (November 24, 2020),
ICMR could derail world's largest trial. ET HealthWorld. Available from: [Cited 19 December 2020]
E. Salazar, K.K. Perez, M. Ashraf, J. Chen, B. Castillo, P.A. Christensen, et al.
Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients with Convalescent Plasma.
Am J Pathol, 190 (2020), pp. 1680-1690
K.L. Chai, S.J. Valk, V. Piechotta, C. Kimber, I. Monsef, C. Doree, et al.
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10 (2020),
Why all Covid patients cannot be plasma donors. Times of India.Available from: [Cited 20 December 2020]
R. Libster, G. Pérez Marc, D. Wappner, S. Coviello, A. Bianchi, V. Braem, et al.
Early High-Titer Plasma Therapy to Prevent Severe Covid-19 in Older Adults.
N Engl J Med, (January 6, 2021),
M.J. Joyner, R.E. Carter, J.W. Senefeld, S.A. Klassen, J.R. Mills, P.W. Johnson, et al.
Convalescent Plasma Antibody Levels and the Risk of Death from Covid-19.
A. Fara, Z. Mitrev, R.A. Rosalia, B.M. Assas.
Cytokine storm and COVID-19: a chronicle of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
B. Zhang, X. Zhou, C. Zhu, Y. Song, F. Feng, Y. Qiu, et al.
Immune Phenotyping Based on the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and IgG Level Predicts Disease Severity and Outcome for Patients With COVID-19.
Z. Huang, H. Chen, M. Xue, H. Huang, P. Zheng, W. Luo, et al.
Characteristics and roles of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in patients with different severities of COVID-19.
Clin Exp Immunol, (July 24, 2020),
L. Tan, Q. Wang, D. Zhang, J. Ding, Q. Huang, Y.-.Q. Tang, et al.
Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study.
Signal Transduct Target Ther, 5 (2020),
N. Fathi, N. Rezaei.
Lymphopenia in COVID-19: therapeutic opportunities.
Cell Biol Int, (June 3, 2020),
D. Swaroopa, K. Bhaskar, T. Mahathi, S. Katkam, Y.S. Raju, N. Chandra, et al.
Association of serum interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score with clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Rev Off Publ Indian Soc Crit Care Med, 20 (2016), pp. 518-525
M. Suzuki, M. Hashizume, H. Yoshida, M. Mihara.
Anti-inflammatory mechanism of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-IL-6R antibody: effect on the expression of chemokine and adhesion molecule.
Rheumatol Int, 30 (2010), pp. 309-315
S. Han, R.K. Mallampalli.
The acute respiratory distress syndrome: from mechanism to translation.
J Immunol, 194 (2015), pp. 855-860
A. Gupta, S. Kashte, M. Gupta, H.C. Rodriguez, S.S. Gautam, S. Kadam.
Mesenchymal stem cells and exosome therapy for COVID-19: current status and future perspective.
Hum Cell, 33 (2020), pp. 907-918
N. Roubinian.
TACO and TRALI: biology, risk factors, and prevention strategies.
Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2018 (2018), pp. 585-594
D.D. Richman.
Antiviral drug resistance.
Antiviral Res, 71 (2006), pp. 117-121
The coronavirus is mutating — does it matter?Nature.Available from: [Cited 20 December 2020]
Rampant use of convalescent plasma behind Covid mutation?The New Indian Express. Available from: [Cited 5 January 2021]
J.L.M. Rocha, W.C.F. de Oliveira, N.C. Noronha, N.C.D. Dos Santos, D.T. Covas, V. Picano-Castro, et al.
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Viral Infections: implications for COVID-19.
Stem Cell Rev Rep, (September 7, 2020), pp. 1-23
J. Epstein, T. Burnouf.
Points to consider in the preparation and transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma.
S. Chandrashekar, A. Kantharaj.
Legal and ethical issues in safe blood transfusion.
Indian J Anaesth, 58 (2014), pp. 558-564
H.K. Wong, C.K. Lee, I.F.N. Hung, J.N.S. Leung, J. Hong, K.Y. Yuen, et al.
Practical limitations of convalescent plasma collection: a case scenario in pandemic preparation for influenza A (H1N1) infection.
Transfusion (Paris), 50 (2010), pp. 1967-1971
Copyright © 2021. Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options